Originally this was a reply to this article about a Windows feature called Recall, but there’s a good argument the author’s concerns resonate far beyond Windows and Meta to proprietary generally.

  • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Look, Software shouldn’t be free and open Source. I really like that we probably have a decade left of it before it gets bundled with ad services which it should have been from the start. The more people that adopt it means that it’s only a matter of time as long as we all just passively watch it get usurped

  • Tapionpoika@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Funny how much longer my phone’s battery lasts now after I flashed /e/ to it. No constant net traffic anymore.

  • array@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    YEA I’M GONNA DO IT BASED ON FUD AND NO CITATION BECAUSE SOMEONE ON THE INTERNET SAYS THEY WORK AT FACEBOOK

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      And Facebook as an integrated part of the international surveillance state has been firmly established since Snowden leaked the PRISM program.

      Like, there are a lot of reasons to switch to linux and plenty of them are compelling. But its an absolute fantasy to believe you’re somehow immune to surveillance because you’re using the same software as Amazon’s EC2. Does anyone really believe the NSA hasn’t cracked Linux Mint yet?

      Or, for that matter, that using a linux desktop is going to insulate you from being spied on via a public facing 3rd party social media forum?

      • index@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Like, there are a lot of reasons to switch to linux and plenty of them are compelling. But its an absolute fantasy to believe you’re somehow immune to surveillance because you’re using the same software as Amazon’s EC2. Does anyone really believe the NSA hasn’t cracked Linux Mint yet?

        It’s much harder for the government and bad actors to hide backdoors in open source software than making a deal with a private company

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          For the proprietary software, a lot of it is front-doors. Literally just pay-to-prey. Government agencies pay the big data companies to access their warehouses of scrapped data that come directly off their clients’ machines through explicit information harvesting protocols.

          That said, it is technically harder to have a covert backdoor in an open source system. But it isn’t impossible, or even particularly impractical, so long as the vulnerability remains reasonably obscure. It would be naive to assume your standard array of linux oses are unassailable.

      • ReakDuck@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        You mean with the USA Intel or AMD CPUs?

        Think that it doesn’t matter what you use as OS as the microchip inside the CPU chip can read anything it wants

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Sure. Although that’s just a matter of unplugging your computer from the Internet. Also, at least in theory, Linux isn’t actively leaking all your data into various Cloud services. Microsoft OneDrive and Google Drive are just invitations for the NSA to paw through your file system.

          I just can’t imagine how Linux protects you from posting on Facebook.

          • ReakDuck@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            It wont protect there.

            Also, I remember articles back then mentioning 5G Towers could create a dystopia because every company could easily put a 5G chip into the product and secretly track you regardless of Wifi.

  • Mrkawfee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Shit I was just about to install PopOs! Which is developed by a US company. It’s maddening trying to find the right distro that fits all the requirements.

    • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      A lot of people are going to recommend you mint, I honestly think mint is an outdated suggestion for beginners, I think immutability is extremely important for someone who is just starting out, as well as starting on KDE since it’s by far the most developed DE that isn’t gnome and their… design decisions are unfortunate for people coming from windows.

      I don’t think we should be recommending mint to beginners anymore, if mint makes an immutable, up to date KDE distro, that’ll change, but until then, I think bazzite is objectively a better starting place for beginners.

      The mere fact that bazzite and other immutables generate a new system for you on update and let you switch between and rollback automatically is enough for me to say it’s better, but it also has more up to date software, and tons of guides (fedora is one of the most popular distros, and bazzite is essentially identical except with some QoL upgrades).

      How common is the story of “I was new to linux and completely broke it”? that’s not a good user experience for someone who’s just starting, it’s intimidating, scary, and I just don’t think it’s the best in the modern era. There’s something to be said about learning from these mistakes, but bazzite essentially makes these mistakes impossible.

      Furthermore because of the way bazzite works, package management is completely graphical and requires essentially no intervention on the users part, flathub and immutability pair excellently for this reason.

      Cinnamon (the default mint environment) doesn’t and won’t support HDR, the security/performance improvements from wayland, mixed refresh rate displays, mixed DPI displays, fractional scaling, and many other things for a very very long time if at all. I don’t understand the usecase for cinnamon tbh, xfce is great if you need performance but don’t want to make major sacrifices, lmde is great if you need A LOT of performance, cinnamon isn’t particularly performant and just a strictly worse version of kde in my eyes from the perspective of a beginner, anyway.

      I have 15 years of linux experience and am willing to infinitely troubleshoot if you add me on matrix.

      • Psychadelligoat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I think immutability is extremely important for someone who is just starting out

        It really isn’t, though

        as well as starting on KDE since it’s by far the most developed DE that isn’t gnome and their… design decisions are unfortunate for people coming from windows.

        Good thing Mint uses Cinnamon, which with the flip of one toggle on install changes between the Mac and Windows style environment. To the point my wife literally didn’t notice at first she was on Mint and not Win 10

        Not gonna bother with the rest of your comment if the start is that weak, tbh

        • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          It really isn’t, though

          Really? Being sure that your system is essentially unbreakable isn’t valuable to beginners? I can’t see how. It has massively helped the beginners I have given it to feel safe in tinkering with their system.

          It was important to me, one day my arch just decided to not boot anymore, so, i switched to nixos.

          Good thing Mint uses Cinnamon, which with the flip of one toggle on install changes between the Mac and Windows style environment. To the point my wife literally didn’t notice at first she was on Mint and not Win 10

          I explained in my comment why cinnamon is a terrible choice for beginners, if you had read it you’d know, why even bother replying to a comment you won’t read with such a lazy response?

          “Cinnamon (the default mint environment) doesn’t and won’t support HDR, the security/performance improvements from wayland, mixed refresh rate displays, mixed DPI displays, fractional scaling, and many other things for a very very long time if at all. I don’t understand the usecase for cinnamon tbh, xfce is great if you need performance but don’t want to make major sacrifices, lmde is great if you need A LOT of performance, cinnamon isn’t particularly performant and just a strictly worse version of kde in my eyes from the perspective of a beginner, anyway.”

          There’s so many reasons to choose kde over cinnamon, there is a massive disparity in security between the two, KDE uses wayland by default, and as a result is SIGNIFICANTLY more secure, just off the top of my head, here’s some problems with cinnamon that will not be resolved anytime soon, that have all already been resolved by this transition KDE-side:

          1. Every single app can read your keyboard input without asking
          2. Every single app can see what every single other app is doing without asking
          3. Apps can fullscreen themselves and go over everything else, because they can control their own window placement to any degree they want, again, without asking.

          and in the future the disparity will only go up, just as an example, look at the rate of development on KDE based distros vs cinnamon… cinnamon is entirely outclassed. The KDE team is massive, the cinnamon team is a few people with no real funding. ( if you don’t believe me, here are the stats for the last month cinnamon side: https://github.com/linuxmint/cinnamon/pulse/monthly vs https://github.com/KDE/plasma-desktop/pulse although you’ll note kde isn’t developed on github and that’s just a mirror. It’s not even close, cinnamon has less monthly than 1/10th of the weekly for kde. The KDE text editor alone outpaces all of cinnamon dramatically, https://github.com/KDE/kate/pulse ) The rate of code output and refinement is not even close. The level of customization you can do with KDE vs cinnamon isn’t even comparable. If you run into an issue with cinnamon, you’re SOL, whereas KDE can actually worry about your bugs, because they have so many more developers.

          I have tried giving people cinnamon, it has gone disasterously, usually due to DPI problems. But I don’t think it’s a safe recommendation at all, just given the security issues. Also mixed dpi displays are extremely common, many people have 1 4k and 1 1080p screen, for example, or maybe they plug into a tv… it’s much more common than you think.

          In short, i think the only reasonable recommendations for beginners in terms of desktop environments, are KDE or Gnome (if they’re mac users and are willing to learn something different), unless their hardware is TERRIBLE and old, in which case they might want lxqt or xfce, maybe.

          • procapra@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            As an XFCE user, I dislike the reputation that xfce is only useful for low end old hardware. It’s a fully complete desktop just like cinnamon, kde, or gnome. lxqt however, I would not wish on my worst enemy.

            • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              As an XFCE user, I dislike the reputation that xfce is only useful for low end old hardware.

              We’re talking about specifically for beginners, it’s not nearly as good for beginners as KDE is. You like xfce because you’re used to it and it works for you, but KDE supports a vastly wider variety of usecases, for example, try having two-screen setup with one screen having a 4k display at 144hz, and the other a 1080p screen at 60hz

              This will be impossible to get working properly on xfce. There’s not even a warning, it’ll just act very strangely without explaining itself.

              there’s also the same issues with security that cinnamon have. XFCE does work, but there’s no reason to recommend it to someone who doesn’t already use/like it over KDE.

      • GoodLuckToFriends@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        How common is the story of “I was new to linux and completely broke it”?

        Gee, it’s common even for ‘experienced’ folks. I just went to update to the 6.14 kernel this morning (everything that I use [and monitor for conflicts] was supposedly finally working with it), and apparently that didn’t play well with my desktop manager. Cue the tty at boot and trying different DMs until I finally said screw it and went back to the previous kernel.

        • bampop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          I find it weird that there is this whole conversation about new/experienced users, and it’s perhaps a problematic thing with Linux. Many people, myself included, don’t give 2 shits about how their OS works. I don’t want to spend my time tending to it as if it were a fucking garden. I just need it to work, so I can get on with my own stuff. No matter how “experienced” I get, that’s always going to be the case. Maybe I’m just a little traumatized about this because the first Linux distro I used was Gentoo.

          • GoodLuckToFriends@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            I think it’s overblown for the most part. Yes, the OS should just work… but it does, for 99% of users, on windows, and linux, and probably macos, which I haven’t used so can’t speak on.

            The ones who blow up their systems are either techies who like futzing with stuff, or are using a ‘bad’ distro for their needs. If you’re switching over granny, you set her up with a long term stable kernel, a vanilla distro, and a browser. The few other stories are when people switch from windows and want something specialized to be the same. Those will need a customized solution, but it’s not much different than windows when something breaks. Whoever is playing IT gets to poke at a stupid amount of settings, registry edits, or esoteric drivers/dependencies.

      • Mike@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I 100% agree. Immutable is the way to go for beginners. Source: started on Mint and actually had a few problems. Now I’m on Bluefin (previously Aurora) and I have none.

    • Una@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      According to Distrowatch mint and Zorin are from Ireland, opensuse and manjaro are from Germany and more was lazy for more searching

          • hddsx@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            When SLES 12 came out they made everything harder and forced everyone to migrate to 64 bit, even if you were doing legacy development

            • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              I agree that the backend for snaps being proprietary sucks, but I actually think snaps themselves are pretty useful in server configurations because of the sandboxing and limiting access to system resources. I get the whole argument that it’s doing what flatpak already did yadda yadda, but like… competing standards happens. It’s part of life and always will be.

          • albert180@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Well, their “customisation” of Gnome with that ugly bar on the left side is still ugly as hell

            • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              That’s part of why I use Xubuntu/Kubuntu mainly and Lubuntu for real low end stuff. Straight vanilla Ubuntu is… not super appealing. Ubuntu server that’s just CLI/headless though, that’s pretty tits, imho.

              • Godort@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                Ubuntu server is okay, but I’ve come to really appreciate a minimal, stable Debian install instead.

            • Loucypher@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              That is just a customized version of Dash to Dock. You can move the dock on the bottom if you want or make it auto hide. The same functionality you can expect from Dash to dock but with the Ubuntu theme applied

              • albert180@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                Deutsch
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                I don’t want it at all.
                But thanks for the Head Up that you can make this ugly thing go away

    • rtxn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Stop worrying about the country of origin. It’s a FOSS project. The vast majority of Pop’s components are developed independently of the company, and by citizens of various nations. Applying the “USA bad, so product bad” rhetoric is a seriously shortsighted approach. Consider instead the amount of influence exerted by the company. Does Ubuntu still seem like the better choice just because the company is headquartered in the UK?

      Besides, if you really want to cut American software out of your life, start with Linux and GNU. Torvalds was born in Finland, but he is a naturalized US citizen, and Linux is developed on American infrastructure and includes significant amount of work from American developers.

      • ShrimpCurler@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s not “USA bad, so product bad”, it’s the concern that the US government can do a lot more to US based projects and you probably wont know untill it’s too late.

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          The code is open though, I don’t check it since I am an idiot but I assume pros would spot irregularities.

          Do you have a specific vector of attack here in mind?

          • ShrimpCurler@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            I guess most methods of attack on a FOSS projects are independent of the country of origin. But, I could still see them being forced to do things they don’t want in the US, without being able to tell anyone. Hopefully if that ever happened it wouldn’t be too hard to detect, but you never know.

            • Oniononon@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              People find vulnerabilities and malware even in closed source projects. Us regime is as malicious as it is incompetent. They trust anyone who can throw a sig heil and prompt a LLM to completely dismantle and rebuild major infrastructure.

        • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          That’s really not the case, there’s no proprietary parts to inject this into, and pop is one of the most heavily watched distros for a reason.

          The minimal things they add to their particular distro are essentially just theming, and it’d be really obvious if they injected something malicious into it.

          It would also NOT be too late because they’re a stable distro and have regular releases, it’d have to be a completely last minute unexpected change for that to be the case.

      • albert180@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        Deutsch
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        They can still sanction your country and then you can’t get updates anymore over official ways, like Fedora and Iran.

        It’s just peace of mind to not deal with anything US Based right now

  • Paddy66@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    https://distrosea.com/ this is amazing for previewing linux OS flavours right in your browser, no need for a USB stick or installation! Linux Mint, Zorin, Ubuntu and Fedora are the winners for me in terms of being normie friendly.

  • woop_woop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    “im a henchman for a bad guy…and lemme tell you…I think we might be starting to do bad stuff…not sure yet…”

    Thanks bud

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Hey now, he didn’t say he was working close with Trump, he said he was working closing with Trump.

      I’m sure there’s a distinct difference.

    • ShrimpCurler@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      People gotta earn money to survive, I don’t blame the employees for this. And this is not just a case of Meta’s privacy being bad. This is close government involvement with potentially serious impacts and implications across all US based platforms.

      • SpaceShort@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        It makes sense to continue working there but then leak everything to an independent journalist.

    • TootTootComingThru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Dog, this Linux-Is-Best dipshit almost ruined and ran a local /r/massachusetts subreddit into the ground a couple years back. I remember it because I was there and had a role in getting them removed.

      https://www.reddit.com/r/SubredditDrama/comments/11wsnla/mod_of_3_months_in_rmassachusetts_purges_members/

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JS7gw2h5n2o

      There’s a bit more to it, someone found out who they were and I forget if they a) didn’t work for FB or b) was just a lowly content control employee or whatever.

      If this is the same person, I think they’re legitimately unwell.

    • JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      At some point we need to start welcoming people to the Light, instead of demonizing them for having been in the Dark. It’s pretty difficult for me not to dunk on people as they wake up to the nightmare that they voted for, but a lot them ARE actually otherwise decent folks. Making America Great is going to involve deprogramming a lot of people.

      • woop_woop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        That’s all good and well and I agree with you, but I also believe if you have and are continuing to feed the machine, then you don’t get to be put on a pedestal or respected for recognizing how bad the machine is. This person is repeating something that is already very well known and accepted and is simultaneously adding to the alarm while causing it. I have extremely low patience for that particular brand of person. They are continuing to cause the problem they are rallying against.

        If I were face to face with this person, I’d genuinely say “either quit working there or shut the fuck up.”

        • parody@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          I wonder if employees of evil corporations reading your comment are more likely to quit or chill their speech


          I hope that at least one whistleblower stays employed at every evil corp

        • Tiresia@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Okay then. If you appreciate talking that way, then either delete your account or shut the fuck up.

        • JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          What about when it’s your family? I am estranged from a lot of people that I care deeply for because they refuse to engage with reason. I’m not trying to put anyone on a pedestal, good or bad.

          I just want people to know that they are welcome to change their minds, nobody is going to mock them for doing so, or say I told you so. That’s what they expect, and pride is part of what holds many of them back from admitting that they were wrong. Because it’s what they would do. Unfortunately, we’re going to need to take the high road.

          • Psychadelligoat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            I just want people to know that they are welcome to change their minds, nobody is going to mock them for doing so, or say I told you so.

            JSYK: I and many others are putting great effort into letting them know that they’re not welcome, because Nazis who voted for this wanted this, no excuses at campaign #3. They can either die or live in obscurity until they do, period. The time they were allowed back was pre-24 election, simple as

              • parody@lemmings.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                Agree that person would certainly be an over generalizer. What’s the Nazi part about it from your perspective?

                • JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Idk man I’m just upset about my family and jealous of people that don’t have to deal with writing off roughly half the people they care about.

          • woop_woop@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            The predestal/respect bit in my comment was about this post as a whole. IMO, the screenshotted person does not deserve to be paid attention to. They are not revealing anything new by any means while choosing to make the problem worse.

            I don’t know what anyone being in my family has to do with anything. My response is the same: if you are unhappy enough to complain out loud about something you are helping cause, either do something about it or shut the fuck up.

    • irotsoma@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Unfortunately, not everyone has a choice in who they work for in end-stage-capitalism. Work is about survival, not ideology. The majority of Americans are not far-right capitalists, but the vast majority of CEOs are, and it’s not really possible to survive long enough to state a small business in most of the US without investment from a far-right capitalist or inheritance (usually also from a far-right capitalist family member).

          • ArtificialHoldings@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Very big window between participating in society via capitalism vs working directly for, eg. FAANG or a military defense contractor. It’s leaping over every less shitty option to get to the end because that’s what pays best. How funny that I considered writing a pre-reply for this exact comic in my original comment.

        • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Dude, look around. Most of us are way, WAY past the “We’re all in this together! We can do it if we try!” method of living and have been operating in survival mode for the past 5 years. And can you blame them? The flood waters are rising and people are wanting to make sure they have a life raft. If that means working for evil people/companies, then so be it. It’s not like working somewhere else will stop or slow the flood. Morals are nice, but they won’t keep you afloat.

          • ArtificialHoldings@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yes morals won’t keep you afloat. But FAANG, military defense contractors, and the other most terrible industries waaaay overpay on cost of living, and other industries are also looking to compensate well for expertise (minus some compensation for all the exploitation you wouldn’t be contributing to).

            What you’re describing is the development of a paranoid conservative mindset in response to traumatic global events. This is how my conservative Fox News brainrot parents describe the world, and they are the type to own guns because they’re deathly afraid of home intruders even though their city’s crime index is among the best in the country.

    • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Things have changed. Before, the worst Facebook could do to its critics was ban them and those that they knew. Now Facebook can have ICE turnover your house without a warrant for a troll post. A private company is now working to suppress a specific kind of conversation that questions the judgement and actions of those in power. It’s a subtle but very dangerous difference in why a bad EULA may not have previously caused concern but the new one is.

      • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’d be leery about posting anything on any platform, especially one that has even your email or other personal info attached to it. Even on a random day that I go browse ahem the other place, I don’t really comment anymore. I don’t even have my email tied to that account, but I don’t trust spez’s greedy little pig boy ass, and I’m doing my damn best to fly under the radar while they build their databases. Nor would I trust MS, Google, or even Apple to not be tracking every thought and action online for resistance monitoring.

        • krashmo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          What are you scared of? There’s more of us than there are of them. Hiding in the shadows, too afraid to act is how they win. Be loud and deliberate in voicing your opposition. If they’re coming for you anyway you may as well face it head on.

          • moody@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Until those willing to stand up and fight build up into a critical mass, every individual is at risk of being disappeared by the thought police. So until then, there is a good reason to be scared.

            • krashmo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Well, that’s not going to happen if everyone stays hidden until it’s safe to come out

            • SpaceShort@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Maybe it’s worth buying a gun and learning how to use it so that, if they come for you, you at least get to kill a fascist.

              This could be the only thing that would deter them.

        • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Well, if they want to intimidate everybody who says anything anti-Trump…they’re going to be very busy. What I’m worried about are leaders of movements.

          • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            intimidating everyone is a lot of work, but having them on the list can be useful to disperse wherever they plan on doing next, or purge attempts to organize in a more decentralized way.

            it can even be used to manipulate or target certain cohorts with propaganda and stuff in a way not possible before. surveillance brings control.

            • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Manipulated, you say? With propaganda?

              Well, clearly this is a bridge too far! The Trump administration can never get away with this!

              • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                and stuff

                people are starting to get disappeared to concentration camps atm too.

  • rottingleaf@lemmy.worldBanned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    (Also this won’t really help you because Linux is a mainstream system with big corporate input. Backdoors hidden in plain sight are a thing.

    This will make you feel better though, Windows sucks.)

  • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    imagine how great it feels to say this for like 20 years while getting dismissed as a conspiracy nut.

    and then having it happen exactly as you said it would.

    • index@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      dismissed as a conspiracy nut.

      The government and bad actors use this as a strategy to attack their opponents and control public opinion.

      • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        if ive been saying it for so long, maybe its not exactly new.

        its just that we can’t stop it anymore.

        • untakenusername@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          nah you can totally stop the surveillance. Just use tailsOS, live in the basement of a building under an aluminum ceiling (to hide from synthetic-aperture radar spy sats), near a busy highway (so the LIGO gravity-wave observatory cant record the sound of your footsteps), get food deliveries so you don’t have to leave, and connect to the internet using a neighbors wifi.

          \j

          • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            I was talking more about the panopticon surveillance phenomena, not the people individually trying to hide something which I’d guess its probably still possible.

            But the surveillance state is here to stay and we won’t get rid of it easily is what i’m saying.

  • tiny_hedgehog@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I use Ubuntu. Can someone tell me if that’s “independent and outside US jurisdiction”? I know it’s made/maintained by canonical.

    What are some Linux distros that we should avoid? What are some that are independent?

  • Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    The Linux Foundation itself is in the US jurisdiction - just sayin’.

    Which is why I repeatedly called for the Foundation to move into Europe, potentially into Finland, back to its roots.

    • Javi@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      They do have Linux foundation Europe, which has a hq in Brussels. Afaik, all of the Europe OS projects supported by LFE are hosted in Europe also. They also claim to be independent; though I’m not sure if that means from LF entirely. Checking the job boards show roles in California and Germany however; suggesting they are the same entity. (Though I suppose that could just be collaborative?).

      The very nature of open source means someone else could just pick it up even if the entirety of LF were wiped out. (There are 5000+ collaborators on the Linux kernel git repo) But the reality is a large portion of those actively working on the kernel, are likely involved in LF in some capacity. Add the fact that LF fund multiple Open source projects, The impact of losing LF would be drastic for the future development of not just Linux, But the FOSS ecosystem as a whole.

      This isn’t the only threat to FOSS either; The fact that GitHub is owned by Microsoft is a concern imo.

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Not only that, but it also affects the decision making. For example, quite recently Russian maintainers were removed from the Linux kernel, citing “compliance”.

        It’s easy to imagine same thing happening to Chinese maintainers, for example. And then from other countries. This, too, can strongly affect not just Linux, but FOSS landscape as a whole.

        Thanks for bringing up the European foundation, I’ll look into it!

  • bipedalsheep@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I switched from Fedora to openSUSE recently and it has been painless. Would recommend to anyone who are looking to get away from US companies and US jurisdiction.

    • vga@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’ve been wondering about a similar change, or possibly to Arch. What I’m still wondering about is security: Fedora has Selinux enabled all over the system, and Opensuse and Arch do not. Anyone know what level of risk this mitigates?

      • turtle [he/him]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I think OpenSUSE Tumbleweed has SELinux enabled now too. I’m not sure what you mean by all over the system, as I’m not that familiar with SELinux yet. I believe that Tumbleweed used to use AppArmor but recently switched to SELinux? I also believe that Leap (the stable version of OpenSUSE) still uses AppArmor.

        • vga@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Based on opensuse’s docs, it seems to be in permissive state, whereas on my Fedora by default:

          $ selinuxenabled  && echo yup
          yup
          $ getenforce
          Enforcing
          

          Not sure if the warm fuzzy feelings I get from this are justified (like what are the actual applied rules on apps? I have no idea), but it is a bit warmer and fuzzier.

        • pmk@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          As a long time debian user, I have my eyes on Leap. I value stability (in the unchanging functionality sense) over latest versions.

          • kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            For me Tumbleweed is rock solid even though it is rolling. But if you don’t like subtle changes it might not be fore you.

            • pmk@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              I don’t mind changes, but I want to be able to decide when they happen. Maybe I’m just traumatized from the last time I used a rolling release distro and suddenly Gnome 3 landed and replaced Gnome 2. I did not like that.

            • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              No matter which OpenSuse people end up choosing, it’s a super solid decision. Even though it relies on infrastructure by SUSE S.A., a company that unfortunately has ties to the US (mostly hosting with offices and employees in the US) but got its HQ in Europe, it’s the most solid and user-friendly distro out there if you look for rather independent distros (the only user-friendly one that’s fully independent would be Mageia, but that one really isn’t where it would have to be imho). And the existence of bootable snapshots in case something happened is extremely useful. The biggest problems I’ve found are just 2: Problems with the Nvidia driver (especially if you use said snapshots), and Flathub not coming preconfigured (not a Problem in KDE since there’s a button new users can stumble over, but for Gnome you have to know something rather important is missing to look up the command to add it since there isn’t a GUI to add Flatpak repos yet).

              Other than that the whole OpenSuse ecosystem is just great.

              • kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                Mmm interesting. I have not hat any issues with rolling back and snapshots. Even though I do use nvidia. Configuring flathub shouldn’t be too difficult I think. But I don’t use a DE eather

                • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Which Nvidia driver setup do you use? The problems arise with the proprietary driver; if you roll back or use a different kernel than the current default (as specified by the repo) both my brother and I had the unfortunate situation of the driver kernel module missing. Nouveau or NVK probably don’t cause such issues.

              • turtle [he/him]@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                Flathub not coming preconfigured

                Huh, that’s odd. I’ve been test driving different Linux distros lately for my move away from Windows, and Tumbleweed was one of the ones I tried. KDE Discover in Tumbleweed had Flatpak options for software, and I’m pretty sure it was tied to Flathub and not a different repo like Fedora does. Maybe I’m misremembering? Or did you mean that it doesn’t have the Flathub application itself?

                • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Like I said it’s less of a problem with KDE, they even got a button to add Flathub specifically in Discover. It’s more of a thing with Gnome and Gnome Software where no “Add Flathub” button exists (and also no GUI to add repos -> they have to look up the whole CLI command), so newer users won’t necessarily be aware that something rather important is missing.