Our News Team @ 11 with host Snot Flickerman


Yes, I can hear you, Clem Fandango!

  • 1 Post
  • 187 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: October 24th, 2023

help-circle


  • I mean, fair take, but sometimes more thoughtful and forward-looking companies aren’t looking for fast return on investment.

    It could be argued similarly for Valve that all their investment in Linux ecosystems and open source in general when Linux desktops account for just over 3% of all desktop installations while Windows sits comfortably at 70% of the desktop market, just isn’t a lucrative investment.

    While in the long-term it frees Valve from the restrictions of the Microsoft environment and from the risk that Microsoft would make it more and more difficult for Steam to integrate as they try to make their own game store and Game Pass the premiere gaming experience on Windows, those are future risks that are speculation, even though they are rational speculation.

    Investing so deeply in open source isn’t a lucrative thing for Valve to be doing, but they’re looking at long-term goals.

    In other words, I could see the goal here being something like protecting the Bitwarden brand and making sure more people are using their official client than unofficial with the goal of making it easy to use and enticing people into the general Bitwarden ecosystem long-term. Ten years from now, people who have been running Bitwarden Lite might have a lot more options for integration and paid services than people simply using Vaultwarden.

    Is that lucrative? No, but it’s still pursuing brand-name dominance and keeping people officially within their ecosystem as a way to grow userbase and give users more features (including paid ones) that may not be immediately available or easily integrated with Vaultwarden.






  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zonetoSelfhosted@lemmy.world!@$& Homelab Networking
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    When you do it for work, you log what you have changed each time you make a change to try to fix it, and you log what you revert, so you can keep track of what you have tried, what worked, and what didn’t and have a clearer idea of what the solution was.

    Sometimes it really does take a while to nail down though, and sometimes it isn’t entirely clear why what worked worked. Especially if you’re a junior network engineer without as much experience.







  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zonetoPrivacy@lemmy.mlPhone Purgatory
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The reality is that security/privacy will always be a balancing act with convenience.

    If you increase your security and privacy, you will lose convenience.

    If you increase your convenience, you will lose security and privacy.

    It’s always a tradeoff.

    It’s up to you what things you’re willing to trade off, in the end. Everyone can give valuable input, but it will always be up to you to make the final decision on what level of tradeoff you’re willing to accept and what level fits your threat model.

    For total security and privacy you would basically have to not use electronics at all and live in a cabin in the woods and have a good grasp of chemistry, scavenging and farming to take care of yourself. I think a guy named Ted did that once and it didn’t work out so great for him, but of course, he also didn’t actually just keep to himself in those woods.

    And to be fair, these days even that’s not a guarantee of total privacy with satellite imagery, drones, etc.



  • Look into the Gideons. I don’t agree with all their philosophy obviously, but they’re like the Open Source/Open Knowledge group of the Christian faith.

    One of their main things is that they think since the Bible is the word of God, and people deserve to be saved, that it’s their job to ensure everyone gets a fair shake at access to a Bible without having to pay for it. You used to always be able to find a Bible in a hotel thanks to them, and they’re often at public gatherings handing out copies as well.

    I’m not religious, and I don’t agree with much of what they believe, but I do think that is an appropriate way to view the situation, that it should be freely available to all instead of essentially locked behind a paywall.



  • it can end up receiving packets not meant for it because switches will flood all the ports for packets they don’t know how to route

    This is only applicable to IPv4 networking and is very much “the old way” of doing things. If you have properly designed and set up your own home network, you shouldn’t be having broadcast traffic happen at all, because all your switches should have a MAC table that includes all the devices you have physically connected. Especially if you have bothered to take the time to hand out static addresses tied to the MAC address. A broadcast should generally only be happening if there is an unknown destination on the LAN, and an unknown destination only happens when there is a new device added at an unknown location. Once a broadcast packet has been sent and replied to, the switch fills it’s MAC table with the information on the new device, now knowing it’s location.

    Wi-Fi’s packets can be intercepted by anyone, it’s technically sending all packets on blast as radio waves at all times. Sure, modern Wi-Fi can be encrypted, but that encryption can also often be broken.

    Finally, IPv6 doesn’t use broadcast packets at all, instead using multicasting, which is similar to a broadcast but doesn’t flood every port in the wired network and is a bit more tightly directed.