• M68040 [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    Wait. He hasn’t crumbled into dust or whatever these “Offputting guy with shit politics who has an inexplicable army of irritating tween fans” youtubers do when they’re past their shelf life? I thought he was irritating when I was in high school. That was…what, thirteen years ago now?

  • Bitswap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    Why is this guy popping up so much lately on Lemmy? I remember thinking this guy was a piece of shit about a decade ago…

    I haven’t kept up with the times. Was I right? Or did I become an angry old man 20 years to early?

        • Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          It is quite the opposite. It will answer your question in it’s first 30secs. Even reading the other comments here will. Lol.

          • Bitswap@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            13 days ago

            Quite literally the opposite. The first minute does not answer my question about why he has been appearing all over lemmy. Neither do the comments here.

            Sure he’s trying to degoogle. Hence this post, but that is not what I asked.

            Unclear if you’re a troll or just choosing to be dense…

  • Zagorath@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    Why is the open source Chromium ranked worse than Google Chrome? Like sure, it’s not gonna go very high, but it deserves better than that.

      • Dr_Vindaloo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        I don’t mean this in a mean way, honestly curious – fascist how? As far as I know he made a couple of distasteful jokes a decade ago and apologized for it. Not great but we should stop using words like fascist and Nazi unless we can back it up.

  • Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    Brave? Hard no. Vivaldi? Also no.

    Also, where are qutebrowser and Zen?

    qutebrowser and IceCat are real top of the game when it comes to privacy. But then, they break some of the sites functionality, especially IceCat who seems to be going under the “if your site doesn’t work, it’s your site’s problem” motto.

    • Epzillon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      Which is honestly fair? Like, i would enjoy a “unsafe site, access anyways?” button, but if privacy settings break a page that literally is the pages fault for not respecting privacy.

      Edit: typo

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        Kinda, but I would like to tailor my experience a bit more than “all or nothing”.

        IceCat is directly a GNU project, so it’s highly ideological - which is important and respectable in a way, but then it gets adoption to near-zero because most sites just don’t work out of the box, and to make it work properly means completely removing all safeguards that make IceCat make sense. There’s little in between.

        I’d rather have something like LibreWolf, but without phone-home functionality, or at least a switch to turn it off. Out of all Firefox forks I know, only IceCat respects user privacy in this way - 0 connections on startup, and then only connection to actual site and whatever it requires.

        Opt-in telemetry (ideally - leveled) and manual bug information sending are totally fine, though.

          • Allero@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            17 days ago

            Nothing in the browser should be proprietary. Any proprietary part is a possibility of malice, and browsers are mission critical.

            • LeTak@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              17 days ago

              I don’t disagree with that. It’s just that most browsers are built that way, unfortunately. Nothing is free, not even Firefox. If you want to sell it, it’s hard to maintain reasonable expectations that people won’t just build it from source instead of buying it. Something 100% free can’t maintain itself over long time.

              • Allero@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                17 days ago

                Firefox is open source, and while it takes some shady practices to fund it (it sure isn’t cheap to run your own damn engine alongside everything on top), I take it as a more tenable compromise. It’s not about free as in beer freedom, it’s about basic security.

                You can also have degoogled Chromium which is open-source if you’re into it.

                • Zerush@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  17 days ago

                  Even EDGE is a ungoogled Chromium (but containing M$ tracking APIs instead). Vivaldi IS a degoogled Chromium, a small part of the UI (by far the most advanced one of any other browser) is proprietary, but not really obfuscated, they show even in the support forum how the user can modding it, if for him isn’t enough what he can do in the most complete setting page ever, the only thing is, you can’t use it for other browser projects. It’s certainly not a privacy or security issue.

                  Chromium as is, is 100% FLOSS but because of this isn’t more private or secure as a proprietary soft, FLOSS isn’t automaticly synonym of privacy and security, a lot of people confuse it, it’s not the propósit of OpenSource, privacy and security of an soft depends only of the intentions of the developer or company, not if their soft is OSS or not. The user can audit the soft, which in any case is needed if he don’t want or be able to check millons of lines in the code which a complex soft like a browser engine has.

  • foremanguy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    That’s a good find that famous people are getting into FOSS (should be free as in freedom too). But it’s really not a good thing that they spread a non expert speaking to the crowd.

    Tier lists are meant to be mainly subjective and pretty relative to the person that made it. In that way Pewdipie could quote experts but in no case should make a tier list based on what he found the last weeks (I didn’t fully watched the video so maybe I’m wrong and he made a big disclaimer)

    • Jarix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      If you watch the video, Felix tells you twice in the same sentence that he uses Arch.

      Lemmy had taught me that this means Felix IS an expert on FOSS

  • SilliusMaximus@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    Still can’t believe that Pewdiepie became one of those Linux youtubers, only thing missing is linux distro reviews and why he can’t use X software xD

  • TCB13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    The only problem with Ungoogled that makes it “not ideal for a normal human” is that fact that it is still cumbersome af to download it. Regular people don’t know github and how to click on “show all assets” and pick the right build.