• 0 Posts
  • 13 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 25th, 2023

help-circle
  • KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.detomemes@lemmy.worldOh hell yeah
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Maybe if a fish was hooked up to a machine running terabytes (edit: actually, petabytes, probably) of stolen data through its brain, punishing it when it fails to produce similar results, until it can produce them… Then I would hate the people who did this to the fish, and the people who support them by using the fish to produce art.






  • KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.detomemes@lemmy.worldFTs
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    NFTs try to introduce artificial scarcity

    Just want to add to that, NFTs aren’t inherently about artificial scarcity, they could also be used to track ownership of rights or real life items without a central authority that everybody needs to trust.

    Of course, cryptobros immediately went to pushing them as an investment scheme, and the actual implementations are slow, inefficient, and downright expensive to use. I don’t think anybody has managed to make NFTs actually useful, but I imagine the original creators weren’t looking to create… Whatever this is.


  • KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.detomemes@lemmy.worldWomp womp
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I will point out, I don’t think “peer review” means repeating the test, it means more generally pointing out issues with the science, right? By that definition, sounds like that’s what they’re doing. That doesn’t make the criticisms inherently valid, but to dismiss it as “they’re free to do their own tests” because “that is how science works” seems dishonest.