Do new torrents bypass this somehow, or is it just by sheer volume and popularity ?
West Asia - Communist - international politics - anti-imperialism - software development - Math, science, chemistry, history, sociology, and a lot more.
Do new torrents bypass this somehow, or is it just by sheer volume and popularity ?
Better than 0 nodes, and this is not counting that they already attacked 3.
You’d be surprised how terrible politician priorities are
Weird question, but what does GnuCash do that you wouldn’t get easily from excel? I haven’t used any of these apps and wondering what I’m missing out on.
If you’re using something like tor, and rotate on every single search, then that would be ideal.
I assume you’re not using tor. That means all your searches can still be linked to you via the network source (ip address, etc.). Google can also use your search patterns to fingerprint you.
It may be one of the better solutions, but there are certainly privacy implications
Its best to use a protocol that doesn’t allow unencrypted messages
This is an implementation thing and not a protocol thing. What protocol doesn’t allow unencrypted messages? I am sure signal’s protocol would still allow it, it’s just that the implementation doesn’t.
And same for XMPP. Just go with the implementation that doesn’t.
Unless you pay from the exchange’s wallet
Sounds like clickbait
deleted by creator
So what is the benefit for the common person, now?
This makes matrix even less attractive to me lol. But you’re right, that’s a very good point.
But it’s not E2E encrypted
Windows is just not ready for this stuff. Most of this stuff is built for Linux. Linux is THE server OS. And windows is painful for developers too, so there’s less solutions for it.
You’ll be a lot better off with Linux for self hosting.
iOS is fully proprietary, so while some might argue that it is more private, it is almost impossible to know. What we do know is that it isn’t private, and apple has a track record against privacy.
I think comparing the two platforms from a privacy perspective is pointless. You’re not going to be private either way. Might as well focus on other factors.
I thought apple’s business model was to not sell your data but charge more upfront.
Charging more? Absolutely. Not sell your data? No, they will sell.
Charging more is only because people are willing to pay it. So why not? Most people don’t even care about their data being sold, and will not stop buying apple products for it.
deleted by creator