Many people enjoy discussing and judging the morals of characters in films, but that’s not the main point. Very few characters are entirely good or entirely evil, which tends to result in dull and poorly made movies. Regardless of whether viewers resonate with the story, they should show compassion for the characters. It’s important to interpret their motives and circumstances to understand what led them to make certain decisions and to reflect on ourselves.

  • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    That’s not unpopular, it’s wrong. Movies are criticized when the characters are one dimensional and lack moral nuance.

      • RayNASCAR@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Because it makes them more interesting. If I kick puppies just because I’m “evil” and I like to kick puppies, thats a boring one dimensional character.
        If I kick puppies because I genuinely believe that will cure cancer, then that’s more interesting.

        • Kowowow@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          But how do not find “justified” evil boring at this point, not every bad guy should be macbeth or dr.frankenstein

          It’s like that new stupid wicked witch movie that’s cooming out just because they are an antagonist doesn’t mean they can’t just be a villian, there can be decent characters that don’t need much back story or deep motivation like the joker or judge holden

          • snooggums@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            The Joker has a motivation though, his worldview is that everything is chaos and he needs to prove it to everyone else. Especially Batman.

              • snooggums@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                It means that when he does things, they feel like things the Joker would do. In the Dark Knight he takes all the mob money and burns half of it, because that is a Joker thing to do. Two Face wouldn’t do that, because Two Face has different motivations.

                That is the reason to have motivation. It doesn’t need to be complex, just nuanced.

                • Kowowow@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  Couldn’t two face just be written to have flipped a coin and ending up burning half the money as a result

                  • snooggums@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    He flips the coin to decide people’s fate, not to deatroy money.

                    But you also just gave another example of a character’s nuanced motivation and morals. That is what makes Two Face an interesting character in a different way than the Joker!

                    A villain that burns the money for no reason other than moving the plot forward would be boring.