• Schwim Dandy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Can someone use their words to explain the distaste for the addon that the downvotes on this and crossposted communities seem to represent? Is there something bad about the extension?

    • Substance_P@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      I edited my comment here, but the privacy concern with Chameleon stems from its ability to access and modify data on all websites. This access is necessary for the extension to function, as it needs to alter the user agent and other browser settings. Obviously not great when on secure websites.

  • Substance_P@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Can someone explain why all the downvotes? I’ve always been of the opinion that the more plugins you have, the more identifiable you are, so if that is the reason for the downvotes, I’d understand.

    Edit: yep, it seems the extension requires access to all websites, which allows it to monitor and modify data from any visited site - case closed.

    • happeningtofry99158@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think there might be a bit of misunderstanding about what those permissions mean. The extensions just need to be able to “see” the contents of a web page in order to be able to hide ads, change font & background colors, edit URLs, or redirect resource requests. There is no other way for them to perform those functions unless they have permission to read the original data presented by websites you visit.