This is in India, but coming soon to a country near you (or the one you are in already).

  • Darkness343@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Just wait until we develop psychic powers.

    Let’s see how private your thoughts will be then.

    This is just to get us accustomed to the idea that privacy will be nonexistent at some point.

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Estonia just sentenced a political activist to 14 years for treason for challenging the EU’s collective suicidal warmongering Russophobia propaganda. Political parties that are against NATO are being persecuted, and having election results overturned with a ban of the winners, even while “legitimate right wing parties” adopt racists laws that were part of the “illegitimate right wing party” platform.

    If you have a view that your ruling establishment could have better policies, you are a threat to them. Because you have a good idea. Having nothing to hide means accepting the full supremacy of the establishment, which also means full acceptance of any corruption or mere unoptimalies. The US, with the highest pretenses of free speech, is openly targeting visas and citizens for sentiment against the new ultra fascist establishment.

    You have everything to hide, if you’d like to do something right.

  • onlooker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Ugh, so tired of this old argument. Nothing to hide doesn’t mean everything to show. There, now let’s get on with our lives.

    • slappyfuck@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Back in the late 90s when people started saying that to me, I’d just say ok, get naked RIGHT NOW. What, now you’ve got something to hide?

      A few people took me seriously from that but it usually just fell short.

  • Digit@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    You have nothing to hide?

    I used to work in advertising.

    I was just doing my job, and striving to do it well, to the very best of my abilities, to serve my client, by maximally getting into your mind, manipulating you, manipulating your perceptions, your preferences, your purchases, by insidiously shaping your associations and implanting suggestions you would not realise happening.

    This was over 20 years ago, before Bill Hicks saved me by telling me to kill myself, and I left advertising for good, promising to never do it again.

    The things I would have done to you, without your ken, had I then had access to the data-mining available today… … just the same as those who are still in advertising are doing to you now. [And the resources my team of 2 had, were miniscule, compared to those with millions and billions to invest, and we still managed to shape the culture and prevailing perceptions, so think what kind of influence they have…]

    Nothing to hide?

    Sure, let advertisers know everything about you, to ease their way playing you like a puppet without you realising.

    Nothing to hide?

    Why are you not walking around naked then? Just thermal regulation? Or to preserve your dignity? By preserving your privacy? Are you sure you have nothing to hide? If still sure, by all means, invite every perverted voyeur into your bathroom and bedroom and beyond.

    You surely have at least two things to hide.

    Not hiding them does not just harm you and cause you loss, it harms everybody else too. Your duty to poke big brother (or big baron or big bot or big blight or big bully or big bank) in the eye, is not just to yourself. It’s to everybody, each and all.

    You have much to hide.

    • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.onlineOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      It is almost incredible how advertising has contributed so goddamn much to the erosion of privacy. If data collection was used entirely to do things like improve aiding people (such as language learning. Many apps, like Duolingo and others absolutely use user data to improve their software and develop better ways of teaching languages) it wouldn’t be so bad. But to sell people shit? That is just disgusting.

  • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    One of many countries who have recently decided that basic liberty is more trouble than it’s worth. Our governments all just need to admit that we are engaged in informational WW3.

  • whelk@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Cool. Let me install these cameras in your house, including your bedroom and bathrooms. Nothing to hide, nothing to fear

  • Kjell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    What about if a person working for the public sector contacts a journalist about corruption? Or if a nurse contacts a journalist on how bad a hospital (owned by public sector) is controlled? Are those things that are worth hiding? And how should a normal person hide it if everything is monitored?

    And what about the future? Even if it is currently legal to be positive to radical ideas such as trans-people, immigration or environment, how will they ensure that a future government doesn’t make one of those things illegal and then comes after people who endorsed the radical idea?

  • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    The Stasi said the same thing, and similar levels of surveillance are significantly cheaper now.

    • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.onlineOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Fun fact: According to an ex-CIA spy, most spy gear that real spies use are bought directly off amazon and other online stores. While there are some guys who do craft custom items, they aren’t nearly as common or as fancy as the James Bond films.

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Good point, I was more thinking of digital surveillance as so much is online now.

  • Stern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    I presume they’re okay with the first surveillance cameras being in their bedrooms then.

    • artyom@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      I feel like the best way to combat this is to dig up info on politicians and release it all publicly. Nothing illegal about that. If I knew how, I would.

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    A lot of countries are increasingly overreaching with privacy. There is global-wide coordination going on that we haven’t seen since the leftist international during Cold War, but this time it’s coming from the right.

  • Kintarian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    I’d like to go to one of their houses and tell them I want to search the place. After all, they shouldn’t mind if they have nothing to hide, right?

    • Digit@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Probably a bluff.

      I’m sure they’d not want you to find their dungeon, or evidence of their corruption and bribery.

      [Edit: nor just all the usual parts of privacy and data integrity.]