ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 1 month agoPeople with nothing to hide need not be bothered about surveillance, Supreme Court sayswww.thehindu.comexternal-linkmessage-square121linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkPeople with nothing to hide need not be bothered about surveillance, Supreme Court sayswww.thehindu.comArmchairAce1944@discuss.online to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 1 month agomessage-square121linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareStern@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoI presume they’re okay with the first surveillance cameras being in their bedrooms then.
minus-squareartyom@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoI feel like the best way to combat this is to dig up info on politicians and release it all publicly. Nothing illegal about that. If I knew how, I would.
minus-squarerageagainstmachines@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoDidn’t Jon Oliver threaten to do that in an episode about data brokers? Not sure if he ever did. ****
I presume they’re okay with the first surveillance cameras being in their bedrooms then.
I feel like the best way to combat this is to dig up info on politicians and release it all publicly. Nothing illegal about that. If I knew how, I would.
Didn’t Jon Oliver threaten to do that in an episode about data brokers? Not sure if he ever did. ****