yesman@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 1 day agoLiving languagelemmy.worldimagemessage-square324linkfedilinkarrow-up1681arrow-down174
arrow-up1607arrow-down1imageLiving languagelemmy.worldyesman@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 1 day agomessage-square324linkfedilink
minus-squarelmmarsano@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·edit-217 hours ago Needs text alternative. Images of text break much that text alternatives do not. Losses due to image of text lacking alternative: usability we can’t quote the text without pointless bullshit like retyping it or OCR text search is unavailable the system can’t reflow text to varied screen sizes vary presentation (size, contrast) vary modality (audio, braille) accessibility lacks semantic structure (tags for titles, heading levels, sections, paragraphs, lists, emphasis, code, links, accessibility features, etc) some users can’t read this due to lack of alt text users can’t adapt the text for dyslexia or vision impairments systems can’t read the text to them or send it to braille devices searchability: the “text” isn’t indexable by search engine in a meaningful way fault tolerance: no text fallback if image breaks image host is geoblocked due to insane regulations. Contrary to age & humble appearance, text is an advanced technology that provides all these capabilities absent from images. yes, conventions (which include natural language) work that way: the community of users sets the convention what if I told you images can have alt text?
Needs text alternative.
Images of text break much that text alternatives do not. Losses due to image of text lacking alternative:
Contrary to age & humble appearance, text is an advanced technology that provides all these capabilities absent from images.
yes, conventions (which include natural language) work that way: the community of users sets the convention
what if I told you images can have alt text?