That’s like insult to injury… Docker Desktop is already way worse than running on linux!

I think the restrictions are just for publishing containers on Docker Hub. If you aren’t doing that, you aren’t impacted.

My pleasure! Getting this stuff together can be a pain, so I’m always trying to pay it forward. Good luck and let me know if you have any questions!

Here you go. I commented out what is not necessary. There are some passwords noted that you’ll want to set to your own values. Also, pay attention to the volume mappings… I left my values in there, but you’ll almost certainly need to change those to make sense for your host system. Hopefully this is helpful!

services:
  mongodb:
    image: "mongo:6.0"
    volumes:
      - "/mnt/user/appdata/mongo-graylog:/data/db"
#      - "/mnt/user/backup/mongodb:/backup"
    restart: "on-failure"
#    logging:
#      driver: "gelf"
#      options:
#        gelf-address: "udp://10.9.8.7:12201"
#        tag: "mongodb"

  opensearch:
    image: "opensearchproject/opensearch:2.13.0"
    environment:
      - "OPENSEARCH_JAVA_OPTS=-Xms1g -Xmx1g"
      - "bootstrap.memory_lock=true"
      - "discovery.type=single-node"
      - "action.auto_create_index=false"
      - "plugins.security.ssl.http.enabled=false"
      - "plugins.security.disabled=true"
      - "OPENSEARCH_INITIAL_ADMIN_PASSWORD=[yourpasswordhere]"
    ulimits:
      nofile: 64000
      memlock:
        hard: -1
        soft: -1
    volumes:
      - "/mnt/user/appdata/opensearch-graylog:/usr/share/opensearch/data"
    restart: "on-failure"
#    logging:
#      driver: "gelf"
#      options:
#        gelf-address: "udp://10.9.8.7:12201"
#        tag: "opensearch"

  graylog:
    image: "graylog/graylog:6.2.0"
    depends_on:
      opensearch:
        condition: "service_started"
      mongodb:
        condition: "service_started"
    entrypoint: "/usr/bin/tini -- wait-for-it opensearch:9200 --  /docker-entrypoint.sh"
    environment:
      GRAYLOG_TIMEZONE: "America/Los_Angeles"
      TZ: "America/Los_Angeles"
      GRAYLOG_ROOT_TIMEZONE: "America/Los_Angeles"
      GRAYLOG_NODE_ID_FILE: "/usr/share/graylog/data/config/node-id"
      GRAYLOG_PASSWORD_SECRET: "[anotherpasswordhere]"
      GRAYLOG_ROOT_PASSWORD_SHA2: "[aSHA2passwordhash]"
      GRAYLOG_HTTP_BIND_ADDRESS: "0.0.0.0:9000"
      GRAYLOG_HTTP_EXTERNAL_URI: "http://localhost:9000/"
      GRAYLOG_ELASTICSEARCH_HOSTS: "http://opensearch:9200/"
      GRAYLOG_MONGODB_URI: "mongodb://mongodb:27017/graylog"

    ports:
    - "5044:5044/tcp"   # Beats
    - "5140:5140/udp"   # Syslog
    - "5140:5140/tcp"   # Syslog
    - "5141:5141/udp"   # Syslog - dd-wrt
    - "5555:5555/tcp"   # RAW TCP
    - "5555:5555/udp"   # RAW UDP
    - "9000:9000/tcp"   # Server API
    - "12201:12201/tcp" # GELF TCP
    - "12201:12201/udp" # GELF UDP
    - "10000:10000/tcp" # Custom TCP port
    - "10000:10000/udp" # Custom UDP port
    - "13301:13301/tcp" # Forwarder data
    - "13302:13302/tcp" # Forwarder config
    volumes:
      - "/mnt/user/appdata/graylog/data:/usr/share/graylog/data/data"
      - "/mnt/user/appdata/graylog/journal:/usr/share/graylog/data/journal"
      - "/mnt/user/appdata/graylog/etc:/etc/graylog"
    restart: "on-failure"

volumes:
  mongodb_data:
  os_data:
  graylog_data:
  graylog_journal:

Can you clarify what your concern is with “heavy” logging solutions that require database/elasticsearch? If you’re worried about system resources that’s one thing, but if it’s just that it seems “complicated,” I have a docker compose file that handles Graylog, Opensearch, and Mongodb. Just give it a couple of persistent storage volumes, and it’s good to go. You can send logs directly to it with syslog or gelf, or set up a filebeat container to ingest file logs.

There’s a LOT you can do with it once you’ve got your logs into the system, but you don’t NEED to do anything else. Just something to consider!

I’m far from an expert, but it seems to me that if you’re setting up your containers according to best practice you would only be mapping the specific ports needed for the service, which renders a wayward “open port” useless. If there’s some kind of UI exploit, that’s a different story. Perhaps this is why most people suggest not exposing your containerized services to the WAN. If we’re talking about a virus that might affect files, it can only see the files that are mapped to the container which limits the damage that can be done. If you are exposing sensitive files to your container, it might be worth it to vet the container more thoroughly (and make sure you have good backups).

I always use a version tag, but I don’t spend any time reading release notes for 95% of my containers. I’ll go through and update versions a couple times a year. If something breaks, at least I know that it broke because I updated it and I can troubleshoot then. The main consideration for me is to not accidentally update and then having a surprise problem to deal with.

I think the main page has been untouched for a few years now. I think JDM went all in on the forum and Discord and stopped focusing on the static webpage.

The discord is active. There is some problem with the hosting, I don’t remember the details, but they are recommending people use the internet archive to find information posted on the forum for the time being.

I think this is just a terminology difference. The documentation says that “Add Ons” are not supported in Container and Core, but “Add Ons” means the easy button you press to install those services. All of those Add On services are just containers that HAOS manages for you. Every single one of them can be set up as a container manually and function the same as the official “Add Ons.”

I don’t know for sure, but I wonder if the reason for this is that it’s not technically possible for a container to manage other external containers. Does anybody know about this?

To be fair, Addons are just other containers. If you’re using a Docker install for Home Assistant, I think the idea is you already have a handle on your docker host, and you’re capable of adding whatever other containers you might need.

I hear you… it’s definitely not about one tasting better than others, but maybe more about the eating experience. I do think there’s a legitimate argument about how different pasta shapes encourage different pasta to sauce ratios, but at the end of the day it’s just the two elements coming together and the taste is what it is. We should all enjoy it the way we want to! I just wanted to explain why some people talk about certain sauces and certain pasta shapes “belonging” together.

It has everything to do with the consistency of the sauce and how well it sticks to the pasta. For example, spaghetti with a meat sauce isn’t a great choice because the meat won’t actually stick to the pasta and you’ll have to scoop up that meat “manually.” Better is pappardelle, which has a huge surface area that causes the meat to stick to the pasta.