You got this narrative from somewhere other than reality and swallow it whole in complete disregard for evidence. The simplest explanation is you are willing to devour a blatantly false misogynistic narrative that attributes Yoko Ono’s success to a subsequent relationship with a man.
You lack everything that would be needed to backhandedly insult your misogyny with how what she did before meeting Lennon was why Lennon gave a shit about her.
If it wasn’t part of a pattern of misogyny, it’d be cute how confidently and blatantly wrong you are while being completely uninformed.
She rode the coat tails of someone who was an actual artist and the only discussion her “art” has created was whether or not it could be called art.
Who was this person? She performed Cut Piece in 1964 and '65 and didn’t even meet John Lennon until '66.
The first isn’t you, but for some reason you feel the need to continue that thread white-knighting for a blatantly false misogynistic narrative of Yoko Ono’s life as an artist. That wasn’t for you, but you inserted yourself into it. Well, if the shoe fits you so well, I guess you’re welcome to wear it.