Not for firefox, critical firefox security feature not available in flatpak: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1756236
Not for firefox, critical firefox security feature not available in flatpak: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1756236
Do not buy at IKEA then
xz backdoor rely on two testfile with malware, some script that do specific thing to malware to unmask and inject. If commit later change any part to break backdoor, signal probably forced to reject to keep backdoor.
But why reject good change? Might raise red flag.
Fuck now i hungry
No way, tarriff only for west taiwan.
Just disable cookie storage
Me: my lord, is this legal?
GDPR: Nope, illegal, kill him.
No. Missing feature is not bug.
You not write bugreport, you write feature request.
That no bug. There just no html search for image.
from https://lemmy.ca/comment/13913116
Two bills were ready, with bipartisan support. Chuck Schumer (who coincidently has two daughters working as big tech lobbyists) refused to bring the bills for a vote.
At a 2024 event covering antitrust remedies, out of all the invited senators, just a single one showed up - JD Vance.
Chuck Schumer is democrat, JD Vance is republic. Would guess opinion based on personal experience with few people.
There was recent hack on data broker use realtime ad bid stream for location without any code in app. Will link if find again.
Metal drummer: hold my beer
free speech
you fish diddler
but everyone in alternative can look same or have different fingerprint each time.
Well, EU at least start to fine above a billion: https://www.enforcementtracker.com/
𝕯𝖎𝖊𝖘𝖊 𝕶𝖔𝖒𝖒𝖊𝖓𝖙𝖆𝖗𝖘𝖊𝖐𝖙𝖎𝖔𝖓 𝖎𝖘𝖙 𝖓𝖚𝖓 𝕰𝖎𝖌𝖊𝖓𝖙𝖚𝖒 𝖉𝖊𝖗 𝕭𝖚𝖓𝖉𝖊𝖘𝖗𝖊𝖕𝖚𝖇𝖑𝖎𝖐 𝕯𝖊𝖚𝖙𝖘𝖈𝖍𝖑𝖆𝖓𝖉
You know you can crosspost?
Firefox flatpak less secure because namespace not available in flatpak: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1756236