Restricting screenshots is laughable security. If you can read a message then you can take a picture with a second device, there isn’t any software that can stop that.
Preventing screenshots can stop accidents and make someone think twice about it, and disappearing messages prevents returning later and looking them up, but that’s it.
Son of a… Yeah probably new users or something. I’m ok with losing $10 this year though.
I think they just jumped about $10 a year, I was just renewed for $50 a few weeks ago.
I’d never heard of the glitter nail polish, so I looked it up. It would appear that it is possible to defeat, though extremely difficult and tedious to do so, and was done in 2018. Basically by separating the polish and substrate material using a combo of heat and chemicals, then gluing it back on with clear nail polish in the same orientation.
Again, crazy difficult, but you could also just epoxy the case shut.
While I also like the idea of a separate second “internet” I feel like this is just another ID check requirement. It would still be better than a porn token wallet I guess. Either there would be an identity tied to all traffic from an access point(still a privacy problem) , or the access points themselves would have to be like, kept away from children or something somehow. Parental locks?
Yep, a microwave emits orders of magnitude more signal strength than any control system will. My microwave at home, even closed, leaks enough to introduce noise in my wireless headphones if I stand close.
For services that are throwaway, this is fine. I don’t care if someone gains access to my ice cream rewards account, they don’t have anything else important. And I believe these services only last 10 minutes, meaning you can’t password reset them because the inbox doesn’t exist.