

which implies that you misread my intentions
Or perhaps you’re not presenting as you intend
which implies that you misread my intentions
Or perhaps you’re not presenting as you intend
Look buddy you asked why
It’s about women, so the name objectively fits.
My statement is I want to zero out the debt and start over as a society with men and women being completely and totally equal in every way.
No past debts lingering overhead, a blank slate, a fresh start, a new us.
Why would anyone be against that?
probably the “making them A class citizens and men B class citizens” part, that’s not very cash money, blank slate, fresh start. Certainly not “No past debts lingering,” so the downvotes are probably a combination of your cognitive dissonance and smug attitude about fixing oppression with more oppression.
It’s not true though, those people don’t speak for all feminists. You’re focusing on the subset that validates your biases because it reinforces your worldview, i.e. confirmation bias. Some people using female empowerment to put down men does not mean female empowerment is bad.
That’s addiction you’re describing
No it’s the hedonic treadmill
Maximizing pleasure and minimizing pain in the world is a much better thing to live for than accruing capital or assuring that people within a certain geographical area have it better than others if you ask me 🤷
Sure but that doesn’t make it badass.
A better way to say it might be like “some assholes prey on women’s insecurities”. Keep the focus on the person who is the problem, not the victims.
idk I think that’s needlessly condescending to women, not all of them dating assholes are victims, some just like assholes because they like asshole behavior because they’re also an asshole.
Idk man you’re the one that can’t seem to make out the details
It looks exactly like a nude woman with a bottlecap hat, it has to do with the shading. The pic you posted looks like clay, the OP pic looks like shiny skin. Yeah it’s not 100% photorealistic, obviously some details are missing, but the details that are there paint a picture. A nude picture, specifically, I’m pretty sure I can make out nipple and areola.
That detail + shading approximates nudity.
That shading is way different. Even with a properly glazed (heh) clay figure, it would be difficult to achieve the “oiled up skin” shading that Mrs Butterworth has, it looks like a nude photo shoot.
The shading and detail are nothing like a clay figure
but The Orville is just Star Trek with Family Guy jokes
Tropic Thunder had input, support, and consent of the black community?
The government, as a group representing its citizens (theoretically), has the right to collectivize.
You have the right to be an individual but that does not supercede the right of everyone else to work together.
This is why people don’t take you seriously
I don’t think that is any different than SI changing the definition of a meter and calling it a meter still.
This isn’t killing with kindness, this is using the facade of kindness to belittle someone and their opinion.
Do you really think they need a hug, or are you just insinuating that their opinion looks like an emotional outburst?
Glad to see other brands using temperature sensitive labels.