There is a problem with a lot of the people that practice polygamy in an unethical way

That is what the person you responded to said. There is a problem with the cultural of polygamy here because it’s done in an unethical way.

but not polygamy itself.

That is also what the person you replied to said. They clarified specifically that if both genders are free to practice polygamy in the same way there’s no issue.

Frogger 2: Swampy’s Revenge was genuinely great though

“Uh a 151.197 grammer with cheese.”

Quar ter poun der. Perfect size. Good marketing.

“A ThIRd PoUnDeR pLeASe”. Too much to chew. Bad marketing.

That’s an interesting thought, but I believe it to simply be a coincidence.

The base 12 counting being based on counting the division of your fingers is historically verified, but if the division aspect was so compelling to them you’d expect it to carry forward into their writing system.

By the time you get cuneiform math though, they actually go back to base 10.

https://images.app.goo.gl/9GR6VEiT7GHYF3KaA

As you can see base 12 is not in the written system, or for written mathematics. It just was convenient for counting on their hands.

They used mixes of base 10/base 12 and base 60.

Base 10 would be used go determine the symbols for a specific “digit” in base 60.

So similar to how our 13 is 1 ten and 3 ones, their 13 was the symbol for 10 then 3 symbols for 1. 13 = 𒌋𒁹𒁹𒁹 But 73 would be written 𒁹 𒌋𒁹𒁹𒁹

Which would be interpreted as 1 sixty and 13 ones, or 60 + 13

Don’t listen to OP’s bullshit.

They work for big clock. They’re trying to convince you 12 hour clock is useless so they can sell you double the clock.

When it comes to computing, technically everything is a binary choice.

I can’t even imagine translating something like “chat, am I cooked?” to my grandma.

“Hey folks, am I in trouble?”

As someone brand new to Lemmy I’m now learning a lot of horrible new info on myself based on arbitrarily signing up for a random instance.

I didn’t realize I was supposed to psychically know about lemmy lore before ever using it.

But times change and the cost of free tier users surpasses that of paying users. Should the company continue providing the same level of service for free tier users?

“Times changing” here seems to be the central trick to the argument.

What’s interesting about enshittification is that as the company gets more and more profitable there seems to be more and more excuses as to why these free features are so costly.

It’s very easy for a company to put out a statement that times are changing and that the free tier is unaffordable. Is that always true? Who’s to say?

I’m sure sometimes it is true but the doubt is why arguments like this will never go away.

Also, what other term than entitlement would you use for somebody gets something for free, is not promised that it will stay free forever, the free offering is cancelled or limited, and the user starts complaining?

What other term than incompetent would you use for a company that puts out a free product, attracts a bunch of free users, abruptly cuts access for those features and puts it behind a paywall, and then acts surprised when those same users complain about it.

If you want to make a business move go ahead, it’s your right, but accept the complaints from your user base you predictably pissed off.