I didn’t say you made it up.

And the alignment problem doesn’t imply agency.

Complaining that it draws focus away from ai ethics, is an fundamentally misguided view. That is like saying workers rights draws focus away from human rights. You can have both, you should have both. And there is some overlaps.

Sam altman? You went for Sam altman as an “ai safety researcher that is really an hype man”? Is there a worst example? The CEO of the most well known ai company tries to undermine the actual ai safety research and be perceived as “safety aware” for good pr. Shocking…

Elsevier yudkowsky seems to claim that misalignment is a continuous problem in continuously learning ai models and that misalignment could turn into a huge issue without checks and balances and continuously improving on them. And he makes the case that developers have to be aware and counteract unintented harm that their ai can cause (you know the thing that you called ai ethics)

It is so funny to me that you equate “AI Safety” with “fear mongering for a god AI”.

1. They are hype men
2. Then you highlight why AI Safety is important by linking a blog post about the dangers of poorly thought-out AI systems
3. While calling it fear mongering for a god AI.

What are they now?

If you read AI Safety trolley problems and think they are warning you about an ai god, you misunderstood the purpose of the discussion.

Unrelated? https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/boy-who-allegedly-committed-obscene-act-on-cat-arrested

There is always survival times. Sure, some are worse than others, but there are always survival times.

This is more about the personal journey. E.g. in a system that oppresses you, hiding might be easier and less taxing than fighting it, so if you learned to hide to survive, but your goal might be to become someone who has the strength to fight that system to change it. Someone that you like as you “finally” work towards getting to a place where you can thrive.

Congratulations on getting so far! Please stick around and thrive!

The satirical news made too much fun of fascists. Now the fascists take the opportunity to ruin the satirical news. That is the long con.

You can think that way but it isn’t what I wanted to say, which is what I said.

No reason to be hostile. You ain’t winning when you are.

Yeah the child thing is embarrassingly the kind of thought process that a child would have. An adult can’t be flawed, is famously a thing a lot of children think of their parents at first. And it isn’t proper, which is why I said the conversation doesn’t have to be so black and white. Ironically this paragraph isn’t nice either.

I am not sure if “thinking less of them” should be read as “less than me”.

Anyway I don’t have an issue with you. I just thought the conversation is very hostile when your point seems to be about appreciating others and welcoming difference. It seems to be a waste of your energy and time.

Take care!

Edit: if you are wondering why I focused my critic on you. They didn’t seem interested in a conversation anyway. I mean “sky daddy”?

I think this conversation is way more black and white than it needs to be.

You can love and respect someone while thinking that that one belief is really stupid. In fact shockingly stupid. (Not saying religion is shockingly stupid)

I am sure, your best friend once said something or did something that you judged them for negatively. Made you think less of them. While loving them as a whole.

I heard he tried to commission custom hentai but no one wanted to do anything that fucked up, so he started to develop ai, but as he is not getting anywhere, he is back trying to commission stuff.

I agree with you 100% and I want to highlight how weird that behavior is.

First you need to analyze an ad. Then you need to ignore that she has a brand and marketing 101 is that ad needs to fit the brand. Then you need to feel like you can make place for your partner to shine. Only then you can come to these poorly thought-out conclusions.

What it really is:

She takes photos that fits her branding. It is a play on “behind every great man is a great woman…” Highlighting that the greatness of a woman can be her strength/power and the greatness of a man can be their love and care.

What they read, “man behind woman, man take care of children, weak”. How insecure is that?

It is a loving supportive message to men and women and they read it like that.