• 0 Posts
  • 27 Comments
Joined 8 months ago
cake
Cake day: July 22nd, 2024

help-circle
  • Isnt it also a basic issue of temperature ranges?

    First of all, the comfy range for humans is small and it is not even. E.g. most people will find around body temperature of 37°C nice. But 5 °C above that is burning hot, while 32°C is more lukewarm, than cold.

    Then the cold water temp is probably between 10 °C and 15°C depending how long it stood. Same of the hot water temperature, where the first bit in the pipe is more like 20°C and then the boiler comes pushing 60°C in.

    So the temperature range that gets mixed changes drastically in the beginning and small changes can make for a large difference in the “center” of the mixing, which is also where the comfy temperatures are.






  • Saleh@feddit.orgtomemes@lemmy.worldMaybe someday
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    The self impression of the imperial empires at the time. The kind of thinking that justified genocides, slavery and robbery with “but we bring them culture”

    In terms of ethics and culture i would say most places in the world to have been far better developed than European imperialists.


  • Saleh@feddit.orgtomemes@lemmy.worldMaybe someday
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    In art history, literature and cultural studies, Orientalism is the imitation or depiction of aspects of the Eastern world (or “Orient”) by writers, designers, and artists from the Western world. Orientalist painting, particularly of the Middle East,[1] was one of the many specialties of 19th-century academic art, and Western literature was influenced by a similar interest in Oriental themes.

    Critical studies

    Edward Said

    In his book Orientalism (1978), cultural critic Edward Said redefines the term Orientalism to describe a pervasive Western tradition—academic and artistic—of prejudiced outsider-interpretations of the Eastern world, which was shaped by the cultural attitudes of European imperialism in the 18th and 19th centuries.[20] The thesis of Orientalism develops Antonio Gramsci’s theory of cultural hegemony, and Michel Foucault’s theorisation of discourse (the knowledge-power relation) to criticise the scholarly tradition of Oriental studies. Said criticised contemporary scholars who perpetuated the tradition of outsider-interpretation of Arabo-Islamic cultures, especially Bernard Lewis and Fouad Ajami.[21][22] Furthermore, Said said that “The idea of representation is a theatrical one: the Orient is the stage on which the whole East is confined”,[23] and that the subject of learned Orientalists “is not so much the East itself as the East made known, and therefore less fearsome, to the Western reading public”.[24]

    In the academy, the book Orientalism (1978) became a foundational text of post-colonial cultural studies.[22] The analyses in Said’s works are of Orientalism in European literature, especially French literature, and do not analyse visual art and Orientalist painting. In that vein, the art historian Linda Nochlin applied Said’s methods of critical analysis to art, “with uneven results”.[25] Other scholars see Orientalist paintings as depicting a myth and a fantasy that did not often correlate with reality.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orientalism

    Yeah i dont think that people saying “China is kinda based” are trying to appropriate chinese culture from the perspective of a culturally and racially superior western hegemonial empire. Quite to the contrary actually.




  • I guess on the one hand people are anxious about Trumps inaugeration and on the other hand this is a great opportunity for competitors or otherwise opposed people to launch an astroturfing campaign off of it.

    When looking at posts titled has gone “full MAGA” for saying they feel Trump is more likely to enact antitrust rules against big tech than Democrats who let them down the past years, is just absurd.

    It is the same line of reasoning like claiming the WHO to have been a chinese asset because they supported some of Chinas anti-Covid measures.



  • Saleh@feddit.orgtomemes@lemmy.worldSelling out
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Even if the US suddenly lost all its fighter jets, naval force, missiles and bombs. How likely would an invasion be in the next 10 to 50 years?

    It is quite a big country with a big population, with a practically uninhabited and difficult to cross country in the north, and a poor drug war ridden country with significant amount of jungle in the south. To the west and east are oceans with some thousands of kilometres until the next sizable and properly inhabitated landmass.

    So purely in geographics terms, invading and conquering the US is a huge pain.

    Now add to it all the issues of the US dominance in global trade and the ramifications such an invasion would have.

    The US doesnt need that army or MIC for defense. It is offense focused and it needs to keep murdering people all over the world to keep its wheels turning.



  • Saleh@feddit.orgtomemes@lemmy.worldYep, it's pretty normal
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Social harm is much higher with alcohol. There used to be a graph plotting both social and physical harm, but it got replaced with the one you criticise, effectively stating the same thing. Alcohol in its effects for both the individual and society is a hard drug, like coke, heroin or meth.

    But the way you get defensive makes me wonder why aconowledging alcohol to be a serious drug with huge damage both to individuals and society is so difficult.






  • Saleh@feddit.orgtomemes@lemmy.worldYep, it's pretty normal
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    Alcohol is a hard drug. The opiod crisis not being such a thing in Europe is a result of opiods not being downplayed and casualized like in the US, so the reason why the US has an opiod crisis and we have such an alcohol problem are similar. But you drew a line from casual alcohol abuse to somehow work against opiod problems. But more alcohol abuse doesnt lead to less opiod abuse or the other way round.


  • Saleh@feddit.orgtomemes@lemmy.worldYep, it's pretty normal
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    4 months ago

    So did you also do other hard drugs because they were hidden from you? Heroin, Coke, Crack, Meth?

    The opiod crisis has an entirely different basis to them, as tons of Americans were made addicted by reckless prescriptions first.

    And again, seeing my and other parents drink regularly did not stop us from being reckless around alcohol. Instead what it does makes clear signs of alcoholism not be taken as warning. “Dad had two beers every day, whats the harm in three?”

    There is things the US does badly, like not allowing alcohol until 21 and then giving access to vodka and beer alike, where many European countries have different ages for booze and lower strength alcohol. But the idea that people in Europe are more responsible around alcohol doesn’t hold to reality. The US had about 120k alcohol related deaths per year, which jumped to 180k with the pandemic. Germany is at a stable 60-70k a year. But Germany has less than one fourth of the US population.