Top tier shit

Shouldn’t the first guy be also copying, but copying from a literal bull?

Really making me wish we could request asylum within the Federation.

used to refer to people in a general way

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/they

And don’t forget massive deportation efforts that totally won’t hurt a single little guy.

For sure. Context absolutely matters, ans the context here doesn’t establish a pattern from my understanding. So in this case it’s unlikely to be a dog whistle.

But people should still be aware of what the 88/1448 dog whistle looks like.

Yeah fuck that, it’s tuta time.

88 is typically used either on its own, or in full as 1488 by neo nazis and fascists. It’s a dog whistle.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourteen_Words

On its own, it can be used accidentally, such as if you have 88 in your username because you were born in '88, but if paired with other behavioral patterns it can become damning.

A CEO/founder of a communications company praising a fascist is gonna be a major concern of a privacy focused community like this.

Proton should be doing everything they can to keep things private, since that’s they’re whole marketing strategy. Yet here they are licking the boot. That makes them untrustworthy of our data.

I’m in the same boat. What a shit show.

Same goes for the death of windows 10. I want me some cheap Linux boxes.

They can’t stop us from loving him.

That’s not mutually exclusive with my point. So what?

The difference is self defense. As stated elsewhere in this thread, we should all agree its morally acceptable to kill nazis. With them, it’s either kill or be killed. If we didn’t step up against them in WW2 it would have been disastrous. And with CEOs, billionaires, and other business execs it’s no different. They’re actively killing everyone they can as quickly as they can because it makes them a quick buck.

So ultimately it boils down to self defense.

A state however gets no self defense out of capital punishment. It instead becomes a way to silence political opponents, innocents routinely are executed, and so on. The state cannot be granted the power to kill because it will abuse it. The people eventually need to defend themselves from the state when it is granted this power.

The violence of the oppressed is not the same as the violence of the oppressor.

Sure there is. History is littered with examples. Though a more full explanation of the solution is probably a violation of the TOS.