Edited the above recently, you might not see it yet.
This is the channel, but for some reason I am not seeing the original build video for this one.
He’s a fun one if you like these channels. He does a lot of “decorative” stuff that I very much like.
If someone needs to watch the video this is from, I can probably find it after this real stupid meeting I’m in.
I’ll spin up my own instance if necessary. Problem solved.
I am only disappointed that the shirt doesn’t now read “WWNP”.
Me at 30 years old: Thinks I’m “grown up”
How could I not?
https://fedia.io/m/dogs@lemmy.world/t/1842011/CHICKEN-LEG
Yes.
My experience with this one dog says that simplicity, consistency, and immediate reinforcement with rewards are absolutely necessary. We watched a whole lot of puppy training videos before bringing him home, they all said essentially the same thing.
I have also come to know that in the early training process, if the dog even barely does what you want, treat shower. You’re not only training them “how to do the thing,” but that “this is how training works.”
Arlo knows lots of words now, and lots of body language. Most of his communication to us is in the form of body language, and it can be very subtle. On the super obvious side, he has a mat/blanket in his crate, and he wants it to be straight in there. If it’s not, he’ll turn circles inside the crate for “fix it.” Or if we say “fix it” first, he’ll turn circles in response. That didn’t require any treat training, because he’s already self-motivated to have the straightening out of his blanket as the “reward.”
Ours has dogtism. He likes everything to be exactly the same every day. “Other people” are outside of that routine. I’m pretty sure that’s why he likes to do tricks for treats so much: because he knows what is expected and he knows what’s going to happen. I think that “packages” have become part of the “routine,” and that “barking until someone comes” is, too.
I’m really glad that I immediately set the rule “don’t lie to the dog.” He gets confused and frustrated when you tell him something (by words or action), he responds how he should to that thing, and then you don’t follow that with your expected behavior.
We’ve got a few different words for “things that go on outside the window.”
These mostly work, though he does still occasionally need help with “neighbors.”
Patch cables are stranded, spool cable is solid. Spool is good for between jacks and patch panels, less good for crimping RJ45 ends onto.
I love International Harvest.
LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX
You should do cocaine about it.
You’re missing my point.
Any situation where a loaded and functional firearm is present is necessarily less safe than one without it except in the most dire circumstances.
In such a dire circumstance, your having a firearm can - not will, but can - ward off, injure, or kill someone or something that presents a serious and imminent danger to you. But by and large, almost all situations don’t present that kind of serious and imminent danger.
In the absence of that kind of danger, a firearm being present introduces some increased risk (decreased safety).
I hate people who treat them like some toys and fantasize about them.
Agreed.
I would still get one for safety …
Firearms decrease your safety in any but the most dire situation. Unfortunately, those situations are nigh impossible to predict. This means that carrying a firearm incurs some additional risk right now as insurance against a future potential very large risk.
They can be used to preserve something precious but at a price to pay.
Also agreed.
You might be suffering under a variation on the toupee fallacy, and some confirmation bias. You’re not going to hear a whole lot from responsible gun owners, because those people have an understanding of the risk and responsibility they are taking on, and part of taking that responsibility and mitigating that risk is not crowing like a knob about your guns.
And you know you’re gonna change that tune when you’re back on top - back on top in June.
Bread and circuses.