• 0 Posts
  • 26 Comments
Joined tre månader sedan
cake
Cake day: 10 september 2025

help-circle
  • Nomorereddit@lemmy.todaytomemes@lemmy.worldFactual btw
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    åtta timmar sedan

    That example is old, overused, and rarely true. For example: How many old filament lightbulbs do you see on the market today?

    Many cures have made a lot of money in medicine. Iron lungs used to be expensive to maintain, but vaccines made them unnecessary.

    There is plenty of fast and lasting profit in actually curing diseases. The demand for cures is enormous, so successful cures become some of the most valuable medical products ever created.

    Examples from medical history where cures were profitable: 1) polio vaccine, 2) hepatitis c antiviral, 3) small pox vaccine, 4) antibiotics, and 5) H. pylori cure for stomach ulcers.




  • You opened by insulting me instead of addressing my point, which says more about your argument than mine.

    Claiming solar is automatically cheaper ignores system level costs. Wind and solar need storage, backup, and major grid upgrades, and those costs are still high. That is why renewables depend on large subsidies and mandates, just as fossil fuels have historically.

    If solar were truly cheaper in a complete sense, companies would switch on their own because profit is a powerful incentive. The fact that adoption still relies on policy pressure shows the picture is more complicated than the simple claim that fossil fuels only survive through inertia.


  • Nomorereddit@lemmy.todaytomemes@lemmy.worldFactual btw
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    två dagar sedan

    Sigh, all I see is panacea thinking…I want dank memes.

    But here’s some reality for you that’ll destroy my karma.

    The market naturally drives energy toward the lowest price because buyers choose the cheapest reliable option and producers must compete. Inefficient sources fade while the most cost effective ones grow. This happens automatically through supply and demand.

    Many green technologies, depend on heavy subsidies and huge upfront costs. They promise clean and limitless power, but the real costs of materials, storage, and maintenance make them far more expensive than they seem. This makes them feel less like practical solutions and more like a comforting promise being sold as a cure for everything.

    If your energy company could create very cheap energy it would.







  • Weaponizing discomfort is toxic because it uses confusion and shame as a form of control. It makes someone feel small and off balance instead of safe and understood, turning communication into emotional pressure rather than clarity.

    Shame is as old as time. It is just another way of saying “fall in line.”

    Real connection takes far more effort and far more courage. Owning your feelings and your actions is difficult, but it is also infinitely more worthwhile.


  • Weaponizing discomfort is toxic because it uses confusion and shame as control, making someone feel small and off balance instead of safe and understood, turning communication into emotional pressure rather than clarity.

    Shame is as old as time, but people are always responsible for their own feelings.

    Put another way sticks and stone may break my bones, but some people (kratzkopf) will always find some reason to justify being offended.





  • Try 95 to 99%.

    And not really, even if you have a vacant airbnb property in west virginia. That is far away from an unhoused person’s community… Where they get food, support, income and social services.

    And the idea to lock up the poor in their “own” community has been tried many times before, in very unsuccessful ways.

    I had a homeless outreach team under me in a big east coast city for the last five years. What they need is substance abuse treatment, mental health treatment, and a big social network that supports them… Or they will become unhoused as quickly as we house them.