• 1 Post
  • 38 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 1st, 2023

help-circle




  • The simplest explanation is that OP doesn’t have good opsec, and got a few tracking cookies after deleting cookies, before setting up their proxy/VPN. Then, on the VPN, the advertiser recognized their VPN IP address, and chose to exclude that from generating location data, deferring instead to the location indicated in their existing tracking cookies.

    Privacy is hard. The system is rigged against privacy. You have to do everything perfectly, because one simple mistake could leak your IP address.




  • I have self hosted my email since 2006. I gave up on self hosting outgoing mail in 2021, but I still keep the server up for incoming mail, and still set up throwaway accounts on there.

    The hard part of hosting email is getting Google and Microsoft to accept outgoing mail. Tons of businesses that do not have visibly outlook .com or gmail .com addresses are still hosted by those servers.

    I had SPF, DKIM, and a static datacenter IP address with no reputation problems. I still couldn’t get through to Microsoft, not even in people’s junk mail directory, until they manually whitelisted my address. Microsoft didn’t allow them to whitelist a whole domain. Google was a little easier, but they added new demands monthly.

    In 2025, I can’t get reliable delivery to gmail .com addresses even sending from a hotmail .com address in the outlook .com web interface.


  • Limonene@lemmy.worldtoSelfhosted@lemmy.worldHow to selfhost with a VPN
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Not sure how much you’re paying for your VPN, but a virtual private server can be had for about $5 per month. You’ll get a real IPv4 address just for you, so you won’t have to use non-standard port numbers. (You can also use the VPS as a self-hosted VPN or proxy.)

    $5 per month doesn’t get you much processing power, but it gets you plenty of bandwidth. You could self-host your server on your home computer, and reverse-proxy through your NAT using the VPS.






  • Device integrity is important, but in the sense that I don’t want police to be able to get in if they take my phone while it’s locked. The phone should not be trying to protect itself from me, the owner.

    I’m not planning on running any banking apps, nor any other proprietary apps that need any sort of remote attestation. For sensitive data, nothing like “other people’s social security numbers”. Just my own data, which I would prefer remain private.

    Seedvault uses Android’s built-in backup infrastructure, so it won’t back up things like Signal, or proprietary apps that resist being backed up. Only a rooted app (or rooted adb) can properly backup an Android device.

    By “mess with apps’ internal states”, I want to see what data proprietary apps are storing about me, and selectively delete it. I want to replace their certificate authorities with my mitmproxy’s certificate authority, and intercept their connections to understand them. I want to try modifying apps’ code – for example, call recording doesn’t work on my current phone, because there’s supposedly some XML file somewhere that marks all the US as “recording is illegal”. GrapheneOS claims to fix this, but there may be future problems in that same style, which could be fixed by modifying just one file.



  • Limonene@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.worldWho's in charge?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    When you switch to an admin account on Windows, there are still files owned by “TrustedInstaller” that you can’t touch, and processes owned by “System” that you can’t terminate.

    Linux doesn’t have that. When you switch to root, you can kill any process. You can modify or delete any file.





  • This article seems like a lot of FUD written from an anti-FOSS perspective. In their second point, they say that F-droid’s inclusion policy is “ridiculous” for requiring programs exclude proprietary software. I think the author is ridiculous for asking for this. This is what F-droid is for. I don’t want any proprietary apps or libraries on my phone. If developers only want to work on their proprietary software, they don’t get into F-droid. If they make a modified FOSS version and put it in F-droid, and let it bitrot and go unpatched when vulnerabilities are discovered, and F-droid issues a security advisory for that program, that’s not F-droid’s fault.