Regular sleep schedule - good

People get to the weekend and think they’ll get away with staying up late and sleeping in.

It’s not worth it.

https://www.sciencenews.org/article/generative-ai-energy-environmental-cost

Reduce, reuse, recycle applies to digital content as well. When you can, just use a meme template.

Meme responsibly.

They appear to be clueless, so those with a clue may out themselves.

Guess what day it is today

The whip is only present in the John account, I think. The Wiki page is a good read: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleansing_of_the_Temple

Translation: In this moment I am euphoric …

Can you point to a reference? I don’t think you are recalling the story correctly.

They were money changers (currency exchange) and merchants, not a single tax collector.

Jesus cleansed the temple twice, it wasn’t a single event.

Matthew was a tax collector, one of his key disciples. Jesus was also compassionate towards Zaccheus, who was a wealthy tax collector. Zaccheus was wise enough to repent from his over-taxing of citizens, however.

References:

https://www.gotquestions.org/temple-cleanse.html

Zaccheus story - https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke 19:1-10&version=NIV

Meanwhile, in the better hemisphere: Why is the sun still up? I’m tryin’ to sleep!

Sounds like you’re doing a job level 4. Time to get paid, brother.

Yeah, he already covered “poorly aimed or not aimed at all.”

You’re using the New York Times to support the idea that the New York Times didn’t support the war.

What do you think could be an issue with using that evidence?

Edit: I find it amusing that the article you shared is partially blocked (censored) unless I sign up to the NYT.

These sources show that the New York Times supported the war because it poorly reported the idea that Iraq had WMDs. The NYT did not do its due dilligence, intentionally mislead the public, or a mix of factors.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/the-new-york-times-wmd-coverage

https://www.smh.com.au/opinion/the-new-york-times-role-in-promoting-war-on-iraq-20040323-gdilbl.html

I understand where you’re coming from: If natural dialogue is preferred for a creative work, then having laughter audio is inappropriate.

I disagree that canned laughter and live audience laughter are equivalent.

With live audience reactions it’s like watching a theatre presentation, you get to be part of the crowd. We get a chance to laugh at the jokes at a natural pace (allowing for pauses so we don’t miss the next joke) that the audience would set, and their reactions are modulated organically.

Canned laughter doesn’t do this, it doesn’t set a natural pace. It is calculated by an audio engineer, and the laughter will be an unnatural reaction to the joke presented.

It’s the difference between a genuine and forced smile. We can naturally sense something is off. A live audience reaction is superior to canned laughter in most cases.

That being said, some shows don’t need laughter audio to be enjoyable.

The IT Crowd didn’t use canned laugh tracks, They recorded audio of audience responses.

https://youtu.be/sIQNXH8yHsk?t=156

They pay out of initial capital investment and leveraging.

How does pirating make a corporation broke? Making a copy doesn’t steal money.

Edit: We can’t pirate a company into bankruptcy.

Meeting in person.

There are millions of them. You wouldn’t know it though, because they don’t announce themselves.