

I mean, if it weren’t more dangerous, it would be really unbalanced. You want the player to have to make active choices with upsides and downsides.
I mean, if it weren’t more dangerous, it would be really unbalanced. You want the player to have to make active choices with upsides and downsides.
I say we still do it, for good luck
At the same time, they look exactly like Edna Mode
He’s looking for the camera
If there was a service like this, I’d probably buy there every day. I can plan 1-2 days ahead what I’d like to eat, but more is harder. This would be perfect.
What an utterly ridiculous notion. Obviously it’s a magical battery that, once charged, can be inserted into an ancient titan robot to power it back up.
I didn’t say it is all overhyped nonsense, my only point is that I agree with the opinion stated in the meme, and I don’t think people who disagree really understand AI models or what “open source” means.
It’s not an issue though since it’s fr*nch.
Fun fact: Vampires can say God in fr*nch without issues, because it’s such a godless language
I at least do.
A model is an artifact, not the source. We also don’t call binaries “open-source”, even though they are literally the code that’s executed. Why should these phrases suddenly get turned upside down for AI models?
I don’t understand your objections. Even if the amount of data is rather big, it doesn’t change that this data is part of the source, and leaving it out makes the whole project non-open-source.
Under that standard of scrutiny not only could there never be an LLM that would qualify, but projects that are considered open source would not be. Thus making the distinction meaningless.
What? No? Open-source projects literally do meet this standard.
But it is factually inaccurate. We don’t call binaries open-source, we don’t even call visible-source open-source. An AI model is an artifact just like a binary is.
An “open-source” project that doesn’t publish everything needed to rebuild isn’t open-source.
Oh, he just had that lying around