can i put it on a pickaxe and eat it?

I mean, I don’t see how it could be distressing at all, but sounds like it’s just that distressing to to OP

Good point, though I personally find it hard to block things out even with headphones on.

so you do recognize that he can’t get out of this without being fired or telling the speakers to stop, right?

It’s not his fault he’s in a neighboring cubicle

It would be weird for someone to randomly walk out of their office.

Your example was “we’re trying for a baby”, not literally your first sentence in your post.

I found https://www.yourdictionary.com/articles/antigrams-opposites-same-word

…is there a reference escaping me here?

Reduction is gain. —my 10th grade teacher telling us how to chemistry

That’s also pretty much an aesthetics thing. I don’t see how any aesthetic could have a downside over another. For example, being caught in a machine can come with the industrial aesthetic as well.

Firstly there’s still a gap between Rome premiering and Netflix having TV shows.

Secondly, even before Rome, you had Firefly, Thirtysomething, The Sopranos… Just look at primetime instead of daytime.

in a vacuum

This is doing a lot of the heavy lifting here. In essence, you’re saying that it would be better if all our material problems didn’t exist. “Yeah, these are essential processes, but it would be better if we didn’t need them, and so we wouldn’t have their problems. Who wants problems?” This is nearly a truism.

Besides that, what’s rest is that you abhor the aesthetics of nature in favor of that of the industrial. That’s also reasonable but not anything we can discuss.

PS: No idea why these comments are so hostile. I see a ton of people ardently defending nature aesthetics and flaming industrial aesthetics for some reason. Also please don’t take in what they say about you.

plus sometimes they only allocate two characters

what’s hitchless lol

NYT publishes a ton of opinion pieces, especially since back then not everybody could own a press. They just published whatever opinion pieces that fit the page and they found moderately interesting. It could’ve just been a slow month. Plus the writer was chief of the Washington Bureau.

tbf, they did put “LEADER A REACTIONARY Is Anti Red and Anti-Semitic” and “Blackjacks Silence Opposition”, but at the same time “But several reliable, well-informed sources confirmed the idca that Hitler’s unti-Semitism was not so genuine or violent as it sounded, and that he was merely using anti-Semfitie propaganda as a bait to catch mesges of followers and keep them aroused, enthusiastic and in line for the time when his orgzanlzation {s porfected and sufficiently powerful to be emiployed effectively for political pur- poses,”

Taiwan isn’t the only Taiwanese land

left bluesky and endorsed X b/c bluesky decided to do moderation