I see a lot of people complaining that the Fairphone 6 doesn’t have an Aux jack.

Just use an adapter cable.

A 3.5mm Aux jack takes up a significant amount of space just to connect a few wires that could be connected through USB-C anyway, that space could be used for a bigger battery.

Even if there was a good enough reason to keep Aux it should be 2.5mm Aux and not the usual 3.5 as it does exactly the same thing but uses less space

  • Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    The jump from Aux to USB-C is a even bigger improvement than Tape to CD. All manufacturers etc. eventually had to switch from tape to digital, yes it’s a lot of effort, but it needs to happen at some point.

    I’m not arguing for a 2nd USB-C port, I think one is enough, but if you MUST have two ports, than USB-C offers so much more that Aux can’t

    • remon@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      The jump from Aux to USB-C is a even bigger improvement than Tape to CD.

      The use case of the AUX port is to listen something via a wire. USB-C doesn’t offer any improvements here (othen than having to carry one less cable in the longrun, maybe).

      I think one is enough, but if you MUST have two ports, than USB-C offers so much more that Aux can’t

      Sure, it might enable totally new features. But those are not really relevant when we’re discussing the removal of the aux port. That’s like trying to make an argument for CDs over tape by pointing out that you can use CDs as a mirror. Sure you can … but not really the “imrpovment” I was looking for.

      • Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        Aux can only carry two audio channels, if I wanted to plug my phone into a 5.1 Surround sounds system or something alike, Aux would be limiting.

        USB-C has 24 pins, so it won’t have that issue.

        • remon@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yeah, I’m open for having a USB-C port replace the AUX port if the other industries play along and no use-cases/features are lost in the process.

          But until that happens, AUX belongs on smartphones.

          • Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.socialOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            I hope the EU pushes USB-C as the standard for more devices, I have 3 wireless shavers, they all use different charging ports. There is no reason they couldn’t have all been USB-C

            • remon@ani.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              I think razors, thoothbrushes, etc are exempt from the standard because their connectors have to be water resistant, which USB-C isn’t. So probably not happening for now.

              • Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.socialOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 days ago

                Perhaps, but there are many waterproof USB-C devices that you can swim with, so I don’t think it should be much of an issue.

                • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  Have you tried swimming while charging said device? Mobiles like my Pixel 7 will disable it’s USB port if it detects water. I doubt anything could have waterproof usb port outside of sealing the port with external mechanism.