• ManuLeMaboul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    17 hours ago

    It’s because there they can sell them what they actually cost to produce instead of being forced to sell at a loss by the food industry.

    • uncouple9831@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      I very seriously mean this: source?

      Im assuming this is America, which has an overwhelming abundance of arable land and food. So is there any real data that backs up what you’re saying? This is always the traditional excuse for farmers markets being overpriced relative to grocery stores, but they were not always from my pov. So: source? What should a tiny thing of strawberries cost?

    • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      That’s not an incentive for people to shop there. Grocery store prices are already bad enough. No one wants to pay extra money for a more limited selection.

      • SupahRevs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        13 hours ago

        It is an incentive, just not price. People can choose to support a food system that provides a better living, less environmental damage, and other priorities. More people could choose that if they had more disposable income and I don’t fault people for defaulting to price when making purchasing decisions.

      • fort_burp@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I also much prefer the system that leads the farmer to kill himself. I can save money!