Happy to see a privacy-focused carrier, and it has better policies than any other carrier out there. But founder is formerly from Palantir and there’s a lot of VC money behind it (not inherently a problem, just flagging).

Thoughts?

  • Gravitywell.xYz@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    That’s even worse then because they didn’t even have a secure network from start. Be it willful ignorance or intentional assistance, its still a honeypot. This was a huge “I told you so” by a lot of the dark net community when it happened, a lot of people called it WAY ahead of time.

    Encrochat isn’t the only example, so i may have conflated it with one of these other Honeypot operations: ANOM, Phantom Secure , Ghost , SkyECC

    You might be able to see a pattern here. People who actually want security and anonymity know that you can’t trust those things over to a corporation or a bunch of tech broligarchs, they will either betray you intentionally or due to their incompetence.

    • ivn@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I don’t see how being hacked make it “still a honeypot”.

      • Gravitywell.xYz@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        because it was being used to attract criminals into thinking it was a safe and legitimate service, while under theee surface it was relaying all the messages to law enforcement.

        • ivn@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Yes but

          1. as far as we know they had no idea that it was hacked, so I don’t see how you can get a “vibe” if they are blind to it
          2. the criminals were already using it when LE discovered it and then hacked into it